Computer Braille
and
the Future of Braille
If braille is to remain a useful
tool it must remain under the
control of braille users. This can
only be accomplished if the keepers
of braille codes consider the
current practices of its harbingers
of the future: those who access
electronic information with
refreshable braille display (RBD)
systems. MEMS (Micro-Electro-
Mechanical System) technology will
reduce the price of braille displays
by a factor of ten in only a few
years and all braille readers in
developed countries will have the
option of RBDs in no more than a
decade. Small portable braille
displays will be as ubiquitous as
cell phones are now.
RBD users move at will between
braille and print. They write
braille and print with equal ease
via braille and standard keyboards;
they read transcribed braille and
literal print with equal ease on
their braille displays. One of my
blind friends finds it most
convenient to use his standard
keyboard to compose emails to me in
print while proofing them in
contracted braille.
The key to facility with both
braille and print is the one-to-one
transliteration commonly referred to
as either computer braille or Grade
0 braille. Of course, since the
Basic Latin character set used to
transmit electronic information is
comprised of 94 characters, six-dot
braille is not always sufficient for
computer braille; 31 extra cells with
an added dot seven are used when
necessary to distinguish small from
capital letters or to represent all
the special characters uniquely.
Users of the Nemeth code have an
advantage in switching to computer
braille because of the considerable
overlap between the Nemeth code and
the standard computer braille
tables. Users of maths codes which,
like the proposed UEBC, employ upper
numbers or multi-cell symbols for
standard characters like plus and
minus have no choice but to define a
computer braille table which
represents these symbols differently
from their maths code.
Facility with both braille and
print promotes general independence
and better employment
opportunities.
As for jobs, it hardly seems
necessary to point out the great
number of jobs--from secretary to
computer programmer--that require
the ability to read and write
printed characters directly.
As for independence, not so long
ago, all braille users were
dependent on sighted humans to
provide access to print. Now--for
those with access to electronic
information--reading machines (OCR),
screenreaders, transcribing
software, online embossers and
braille displays have replaced this
earlier direct dependence with an
indirect dependence on software and
hardware developers.
Although there isn't much the
average person can do about hardware
problems, the ability to directly
read markup languages, if not
programming languages, considerably
reduces dependence on the developers
of screenreaders and of transcribing
software. This is significant
because the relatively small market
for these applications negatively
impacts both quality and
availability.
The key, of course, is the
conceptual similiarity of print
markup languages to braille codes.
Although these languages are not as
concise as official braille codes
and were not, of course, designed to
produce aesthetically pleasing
sequences of braille cells, they do
nevertheless function as braille
codes in being complete, linear, and
plain text representations of
formatted print materials including
those with non-ASCII characters.
I will close with two illustrative
examples.
Just the other day a blind friend
told me that he'd been temporarily
stymied in his attempt to read some
important information on the
Internet when his screenreader
balked. Luckily, he was able to
read the HTML source directly on his
braille display. In fact, he not
only read what he needed, he
discovered why the screenreader had
stopped and reported the problem to
the developers. (The problem was
the screenreader's failure to ignore
an unexpected extraneous linefeed.)
Computer braille allows braille
users to read and write mathematics
in LATeX source. Many braille users
have learned LATeX and use it to
communicate with sighted teachers
and peers. Unfortunately, although
LATeX was designed to be fairly easy
to write, it is a typesetting markup
language and the source was not
designed for convenience of direct
reading. It is, however, preferable
to nothing.